> > Hm.. Is there a chance to name them other than _1 ... _7? It's not > really more readable than just using the numbers directly.. > Yes, for those which I have the information about. See attached patch.
Alex Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <[email protected]>
Index: src/include/device/pci_ids.h =================================================================== --- src/include/device/pci_ids.h (revision 6315) +++ src/include/device/pci_ids.h (working copy) @@ -1220,6 +1220,24 @@ #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8505_1 0x8605 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8633_1 0xB091 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8367_1 0xB099 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_HT_AGP_CTR 0x0282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_ERR 0x1282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_HOST_CTR 0x2282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_DRAM 0x3282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_PWR 0x4282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_5 0x5282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_6 0x6282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_NB_SB_CTR 0x7282 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_HT_AGP_CTR 0x0204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_ERR 0x1204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_HOST_CTR 0x2204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_DRAM 0x3204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_PWR 0x4204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_5 0x5204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_6 0x6204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8M800_NB_SB_CTR 0x7204 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_AGP 0x3188 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T800_BR 0xb188 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T890CE_0 0x0238 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T890CE_1 0x1238 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_K8T890CE_2 0x2238
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
