Thank you for the patch!

Hamo wrote:
> We mixed normal type declaration and uintxx_t in the definition of
> CBFS headers before, this may confuse newbies who want to study CBFS
> structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Bai <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Peter Stuge <[email protected]>

But I will wait a little to see if anyone else has comments, before I
commit this.


//Peter

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to