On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Jonathan A. Kollasch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:22:39PM +0800, Hamo wrote: >> CBFS document is a little old since the structure of it has changed a >> lot specially CBFS master header. >> This patch updated the document to show the newest structure of CBFS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Bai <[email protected]> >> >> Index: documentation/cbfs.txt >> =================================================================== >> --- documentation/cbfs.txt (revision 6534) >> +++ documentation/cbfs.txt (working copy) >> @@ -144,10 +144,13 @@ >> The following is the structure of the master header: >> >> struct cbfs_header { >> - unsigned int magic; >> - unsigned int size; >> - unsigned int align; >> - unsigned int offset; >> + u32 magic; >> + u32 version; >> + u32 romsize; >> + u32 bootblocksize; >> + u32 align; >> + u32 offset; >> + u32 pad[2]; >> }; > > Any particular reason to not use the C99 uintXX_t types in the docs? > > Jonathan Kollasch >
I don't know. The code style is a little strange. In file src/include/cbfs.h, uXX is used but in file util/cbfstool/common.h, C99 style is used. -- """ Keep It Simple,Stupid. """ Chinese Name: 白杨 Nick Name: Hamo Homepage: http://hamobai.com/ GPG KEY ID: 0xA4691A33 Key fingerprint = 09D5 2D78 8E2B 0995 CF8E 4331 33C4 3D24 A469 1A33 -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
