David Hendricks ([email protected]) just uploaded a new patch set to 
gerrit, which you can find at http://review.coreboot.org/2264

-gerrit

commit 67badbf65e7a7d1082d2a3bb26749bfad0bb2e74
Author: David Hendricks <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat Feb 2 20:19:58 2013 -0800

    exynos5250: remove CPU check from samsung_get_base_* macro
    
    The cpu_is_exynos5() macro seems broken at the moment, so skip it.
    The macro is superfluous and will probably be replaced eventually,
    but at least this will un-break usage sites.
    
    Change-Id: Ibd360cbfa18047ad8a3488d4f24c3fc4d7415eba
    Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <[email protected]>
---
 src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/cpu.h | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/cpu.h b/src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/cpu.h
index f399a42..b859823 100644
--- a/src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/cpu.h
+++ b/src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/cpu.h
@@ -81,11 +81,19 @@
 
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
 
+/* FIXME(dhendrix): cpu_is_exynos5() seems broken atm... */
+#if 0
 #define SAMSUNG_BASE(device, base)                             \
 static inline unsigned int samsung_get_base_##device(void)     \
 {                                                              \
        return cpu_is_exynos5() ? EXYNOS5_##base : 0;           \
 }
+#endif
+#define SAMSUNG_BASE(device, base)                             \
+static inline unsigned int samsung_get_base_##device(void)     \
+{                                                              \
+       return EXYNOS5_##base;                                  \
+}
 
 SAMSUNG_BASE(adc, ADC_BASE)
 SAMSUNG_BASE(clock, CLOCK_BASE)

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to