On 29.04.2013 04:48, Peter Stuge wrote:

> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> not everyone wants or needs grub. So that's part of the point.
>>
>> Could we have a sane discussion about why it's not suitable
> 
> IMO it's a clusterfuck as far as usability is concerned for one. But
> this isn't the GRUB mailing list, so actually it's wholly
> inappropriate to discuss GRUB any further here. If someone
> wants to continue discussing with Vladimir please do so off list.
> 

The thing is that coreboot is useless without some kind of payload. The
bigggest part of effort of making coreboot-based firmware work on
Loongson is porting the payload as the job of coreboot on this platform
is reduced to mere 1000-2000 lines. At this the payload could simply be
linked with fwstart.S and I was going to propose sharing this code with
the other payload if other payload is willing to port and maintain
Loongson. But for this I need the answers to questions I asked and
everybody avoids answering.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to