Am 29.09.2013 23:16, schrieb Paul Menzel:
> With the current approach it is difficult to see the actual changes to
> the template board. Especially in Gerrit. Therefore these board support
> patches are hard to review.
By fixing the tools. My main gripe with git still is its lack of serious
file rename/copy tracking (though that can be worked around manually
locally).
While I can't speak for the git/gerrit communities, I'd guess they
accept patches.

As for what we can do with our own tools, and in particular on AMD
boards: cut down on the duplication. There's lots of stuff in mainboards
that - to me - looks it really belongs into chipset code. That should
simplify reviews even more than hacks to work around git's metadata
tracking limitations.


Patrick

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to