Hello! Same here. I may buy one for the novelty of it, then again I may not. But those low brow comments are getting more and more vile......
And David, I'm referring to all of them. ----- Gregg C Levine [email protected] "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:16 PM, David Hubbard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Gregg Levine <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hello! >> It is interesting. A number of weeks after Ron brought up the >> existence of this gadget, the site I track the availability of >> discussed the thing. >> >> Basically they are trying to stay out of the argument, but the >> comments are quite negative. It seems the connector across one end >> makes it available for the accessories for the rest of us, have the >> gadget making it an interesting thing to use, but see for yourselves: >> http://hackaday.com/2013/12/09/the-40-x86-arduino/ >> >> as you all will see the comments aren't quite positive in their >> statements. > > > I'm not sure which comment you refer to, but a quick review shows only the > most trite of "negative" comments, along the lines of "ARM is cheaper." > > It would be silly to spend any time discussing things in the hackaday.com > comments anyway. The site itself admits they have a problem with the > low-brow comments. > > But even though I personally have no interest in an x86 clone stuffed into > an arduino package, I can find no actual attacks. The comments are pretty > tame for what typically happens on hackaday. > > Cheers, > David -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
