On Saturday, February 08, 2014 05:30:38 PM Peter Stuge wrote: > If the project could change to work somehow differently and that > would help contributors then I think that's something we should > consider identifying and doing. > Allow git merging. Forced cherry-picking is a PITA for almost everybody.
The patches would still go through the same review process, but once the branch is go, the entire branch gets merged at once. Objections? > > It's a natural consequence of the fact that companies can't always > > immediately push all their work upstream. > > What's the difference from Linux kernel development again? > See @above. Alex -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
