* mrnuke <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> [140325 19:13]: > On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 06:56:13 PM Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > * ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> [140325 06:34]: > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Vladimir ' -coder/phcoder' Serbinenko < > > > > > > phco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't see how this prevents any of my propositions for the bulk of > > > the boards. The problem you describe isn't going away with your > > > proposition. We still want to have a top which is supposed to work on > > > all boards. > > > > > > All boards? The Arima HDAMA, 12 years old now, not sold for maybe 10? All > > > boards? Are you sure? > > > > Keeping old boards in a branch of coreboot that is not moving as fast as > > upstream will reduce breakage and stabilize the code base for those > > systems. > > > This model works for linux with really old releases being maintained by > interested people. It is doable. It is reasonable.
Yes, absolutely. These old releases live in extra branches. Same thing we need to do. Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
