Ah, that's what I meant by persistent. Let's take your name and get rid of mine, and we're still at 2 axes?
ron On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:40 PM, David Hendricks <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:29 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I agree with david. >> >> Simple classifications are better. I think I found two axes. >> >> persistent > > > Add to that "always on" versus "boot/resume path". > >> >> replacable >> >> persistent and not replaceable --> this system may not be usable >> non-persistent and not replaceable --> requires a close look >> >> replaceable --> we're ok with enough effort >> >> are there more? >> >> ron > > > > > -- > David Hendricks (dhendrix) > Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc. -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
