Patrick Georgi wrote:
> 9. at some point coreboot-experimental is either a success and becomes
> the new master, or it’s not and vanishes (maybe after picking the good
> ideas). Ideally this happens fast enough that master didn’t diverge too
> badly.
> 
> Comments?

This sounds like a standard topic branch workflow which is what I
thought we were using all along.


//Peter

Attachment: pgpm3HkmD3QaJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to