Hi Paul, last time was with a yonah / 945gm / ich7 based system. i think that was 3-4 years ago (coreboot v2?)
maybe that statement is somewhat subjective and i have just more experience with stuff like that in the meantime. i don't have that code anymore but i think things a just more straight forward and understandable. moreover i found it was a lot easier to get a working build that at least puts out some postcodes and debug log. i think it didn't even compile without modifications the last time. an very important reason is that i have excatly the same board - having (intel) reference boards actively supported makes starting much easier. last time it was hard to find a supported mainboard that could be bought somewhere. best regards, karl. 2014-06-21 10:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel <[email protected]>: > Dear Karl-Heinz, > > > Am Freitag, den 20.06.2014, 21:17 +0200 schrieb Karl-Heinz Nirschl: > > > i did some experiments with the baytrail fsp coreboot and first of all i > > like to say thanks for all the good code! everything looks much better > than > > the last time i tried to do anything with coreboot. > > could you please elaborate on that statement? When was that last time > and what device/board did you look at? I ask because in my experience > the majority of coreboot code lives up to a high standard since several > years now. > > […] > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
