Dear Stefan,
Am Dienstag, den 05.08.2014, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Stefan Reinauer: > * Paul Menzel [140802 15:07]: > > As already commented on your change sets, I’d prefer if you could avoid > > squashing commits. Kyösti made very good points, so I won’t repeat them. > > One of the reasons Isaac has been squashing patches was that some in the > community have been complaining about a vast amount of unsquashed > patches last time, e.g.: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg40272.html very interesting read. ;-) First of, I am sorry, that it looks like one time I write this and the other time that. But it is more my fault for not being clear. So let me clarify. By fix-ups I meant typos or wrong PCI IDs. Looking at the squashed commits in [1], from my point of view, these are no fix-ups and should not have been squashed. > http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2013-January/073543.html Well, that message actually asks for more communication with the community, so is unrelated. > As always, we have taken the community input under consideration, and > tried acting upon it in the best possible way. Yes, thanks again for your answer. > Are you suggesting that the needs have changed here? The basic need has not changed and it looks like it was a misunderstanding in the past. Thanks, Paul [1] http://review.coreboot.org/6425
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
