Hello! Here's suggestion. Let's drop the whole business. Its taking over from the regular day to day business. ----- Gregg C Levine [email protected] "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:21:44 PM Stefan Reinauer wrote: >> * Alexandru Gagniuc <[email protected]> [150214 02:14]: >> [..] >> >> > Do we really want to push people's nerves every year until we finally get >> > a >> > fork? >> > >> > Alex >> >> Alex, >> >> the leadership of this project reserves the right to enforce standards >> and, where required, lock down parts of coreboot.org or the mailing list >> to enforce those standards. >> >> We value your contributions. We also understand that you may not find >> this situation acceptable and hence may not be able to continue as a >> contributor. >> > I think you've pointed just pointed out the root of the problem. Nobody can > claim that you, or a small group of people is entitled to absolute power in > the project. The fact that someone owns all or part of the infrastructure that > runs coreboot does not entitle them to claim that they, or a small group of > people have absolute power in the project. > > If you, or any of the persons we contributors look towards as examples and > guides fail to recognize that we are in fact a community, things will go > south. I've seen it happen before, and I keep hoping it won't happen here. > > I hope this gives all of us an idea of why people can get ticked off, and > helps us avoid situations like this one (or the one last year) in the future. > > Alex > > P.S. > I own part of the infrastructure that runs coreboot. Arguably, I own the most > expensive part of said infrastructure. So what? > > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
