On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:06 AM Paul Menzel < [email protected]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2015, 00:06 -0600 schrieb Alexandru Gagniuc: > > > In the past Ron also disagreed on changing headers by Samsung – taken > from U-Boot I think – saying their lawyers drafted those and therefore > it should stay that way. > That's right, you don't get to change other people's headers, especially when the headers are created by company lawyers. They get picky that way. > > Maybe a vote like in *Unifying IO accessor macros* [2] should be done. > > > That's not how license headers work. You don't vote to change things that a company requires in code it releases. That's too bad, but that's how it is. ron
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
