On 4/20/2015 3:29 PM, Aaron Durbin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Matt DeVillier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 4/20/2015 8:51 AM, Aaron Durbin wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Matt DeVillier >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Greetings! When building upstream master tonight, discovered that cbmem >>>> console output is broken for Intel hardware (testing on google/panther). >>>> With some help on IRC from kmalkki, was able to determine the culprit is >>>> commit ec5e5e0 (New mechanism to define SRAM/memory map with automatic >>>> bounds checking). I verified this via bisecting; the prior commit, >>>> 06ef046, functions normally. >>> Did this get fixed? >> not as of yet (cdf92ea still has the issue) > Try this if you have time? I'm sure I haven't handled all the cases, > but it my work for you. > > http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/9851/
applying this as a cherry-pick gives me garbage/binary output for 'cbmem -c' >>> >>>> regards, >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> -- >>>> coreboot mailing list: [email protected] >>>> http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
