On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Xan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the detailed answer. It's a pitty. AMD is a "devil > company". What can I do? > A few simple things you can do: 1. Don't refer to a partner who has contributed to coreboot for about a decade as a "devil company." 2. Don't reference threads/e-mails that bluster over non-existent legal issues - That is a guaranteed way to end useful dialog. 3. Ask nicely, preferably with a business case for them to make additional effort to support you. > Regards, > > > > > > > > So yes, there has been work done, but it has been more frustration than > > what I would call efficient development so far. There is no contract or > > funding for the fitlet port at the moment, so there is no schedule > > either, at least not from my direction. > > > > All in all, I think it is a nice compact hardware with a couple of > > different but similar enough models to make ports for. I am actually > > hoping this OEM might be the one to catch enough sales volume to have > > something to say to AMD about this binaryPI thing we constantly struggle > > with. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > Kyösti Mälkki > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot > -- David Hendricks (dhendrix) Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
