yes, they all *seem* like the ought to end up aligned, but they don't :-( RISCV changed; they can do unaligned loads now.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:26 PM Julius Werner <[email protected]> wrote: > -mno-unaligned-access is ARM32 only, unfortunately. You'd have to > convince GCC developers to generalize it. > > > This statement is true for coreboot tables. CBFS files are aligned to 64 > bytes by default. > > The problem is that the CBFS stage and payload headers themselves > contain inherently misaligned 64-bit values. I guess if the compiler > was really smart it could stack-allocate a struct { u32 a; u64 b; } > __attribute__((packed)) structure at an odd 4-byte boundary, but it > doesn't currently seem to do that (and neither does cbfstool for the > in-ROM structs). > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
