Alex G. wrote: > >> users of AGESA can continue to contribute and work on the codebase. > > ... and diverge... > > And that's expected. Convergence is a dream.
I disagree. I think it's a goal rather than a dream. > AGESA boards use BuildOpts for configuration, and not much > Kconfig/devicetree.cb I've done a bit of work on moving BuildOpts config for IDS into Kconfig, but it's not quite ready yet. I wrote the change dry and the only test data I have available reports coreboot not working after applying it. :) Sometime.. > SPD parsing routines. I can go on and on. > non-divergence is a moot point. I disagree - I think we need to work towards less divergence rather than move in a direction which is likely to create more divergence. That's the only way to keep the codebase maintainable - which we all want. It was clear to me already when we saw the very first code from AMD that integration into our own codebase would take a while. I don't want to remove contributed code until we've given that a real shot. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot