2016-02-14 8:32 GMT+01:00 Zoran Stojsavljevic <[email protected]>: > [1] FSP 32 bit as is; That's probably best discussed with some Intel field rep for FSP.
> [2] Coreboot to be 64 bit Coreboot, compiled for INTEL x86_64 architecture; The 64bit support was started, but I wouldn't expect it to work just right yet. We don't even enable it by default anywhere, because it isn't really needed. Why do you want coreboot to be 64bit code? > [3] Have the minimum minimorum of Tiano Core (just UEFI HDD/SSD UEFI boot > partition maker, everything else scrapped)! Tianocore is a bit of a sore spot. We have three different implementations of a TianoCore payload, one by Scott Duplichan, working on some AMD board, one by Intel, working on some Intel board (and available in the TianoCore repository) and my copy that I irregularly work on. I'd expect the bare minimum payload able to boot Windows still to take 500-700kb compressed in flash. Patrick -- Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
