So we would submit new ACPI table types to the standards guys? Could we get names like CORE BOOT CBFS
? ron On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot < [email protected]> wrote: > 2016-04-18 19:09 GMT+02:00 Vadim Bendebury <[email protected]>: > > It's been a while since I looked at it, but why not to pass all > > information through the coreboot table? (so that just one pointer > > needs to be shared through ACPI). > One reason for registering these things in ACPI is so that Linux > exports them properly via sysfs. /dev/mem is mostly non-functional in > newer kernel versions. > > > Patrick > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
