Hi Huno, not terribly knowledgeable and speaking from T420-experience
> I've read and used the blobs from the "damaged" custom BIOS. I'm not sure if > this can affect the functionality of Coreboot. Apparently, it does not. If you had damaged the ME firmware, you would not reach coreboot or any other firmware - the blob is signed If you had damaged the NIC firmware, ethernet would probably be broken, so that's clearly defined. > /(Let me know if anyone of you need details/help about/with the HW flashing > in this type of chip (MX25L6406E/MX25L6408E)). refining the wiki would be a good thing to do > *3.1) RAM speed:* > --------------- > *=> So, if I'm understanding it correctly, current 667 Mhz is not the maximum > ***speed *supported. > Any idea on how I can get higher speeds?* That's RAM _clock_ not data rate which is double the clock rate (-> DDR) - you're not any worse off than with the original firmware.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
