> I fail to see what you are trying to tell me. > I'm not sure you even know what a CSM is.
I probably do not. ;-) > And what has all this to do with seabios? Did I ever mention SeaBIOS to play minimal TianoCore? Thank you, Zoran On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Di, 2016-06-07 at 16:35 +0200, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > Note that you can build seabios as CSM for tianocore already. > > > These are the opposites: SeaBIOS is CSM ON (emulates Leagcy BIOS), > > while Tiano Core supposed to be CSM OFF (UEFI), Thus, SeaBIOS and > > Tiano Core exclude each other (should not be used together -> wrong > > architecture). > > I fail to see what you are trying to tell me. > I'm not sure you even know what a CSM is. > > > > What is the point? You can just run tianocore as coreboot playload. > > > The point is to make minimal Tiano Core (minimum for making FAT32 > > partition/file system on HDD/SDD to create /boot/EFI/ directory, in > > other words minimal UEFI compliant BIOS), Tiano Core as such is good > > to be used/run for/on x86 architecture ONLY (and side effect is the > > extended time for booting, since all these DXE drivers must be > > installed, which will be later mostly replaced/run over with OS > > drivers, except run time services). > > > As such, Minimal Tiano Core (minimal UEFI compliant BIOS) could be > > used on ARM architectures too, thus making ARM HW platforms also > > compatible/lookalike as x86 UEFI compliant BIOS. > > tianocore already runs on arm. > seabios doesn't and it never will. > > > In nutshell, then you can build PC/Laptop with ARM CPU/SoC HW > > platform, having coreboot + minimal Tiano Core + WIN 10 Boot Loader + > > WIN10 on it (since WIN10 BL does see UEFI compliance, not knowing what > > is really under the hood). ;-) > > And what has all this to do with seabios? > > confused, > Gerd > >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
