If you refactor that code, could you make it easier to add the fallback? One of the main reason I use overlayfs is to keep a separate fallback
Overlayfs may remain a good option when working on separate source trees, but when the differences are just in the .config. it would be nice to specify the .config-fallback, the .config-normal, run make and get a coreboot.rom without having to manually give the file that needs to be updated. I wrote scripts to do just that. On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:36 PM, ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 1:00 PM Matt DeVillier <matt.devill...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I had the same thought even while writing that note. So option 2 for the >> config file is to create it at the top level: config.${MAINBOARD) or >> somewhere else. Would that work? >> >> >> using top level for config files would really clutter the root dir when >> building for a large # of boards (I have ~25 I'm building for currently); >> perhaps a 'configs' subdir would make sense? >> > > > yes, and the configs would go well in a .gitignore ... > > -- > coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org > https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot