Dear Ron,
Am Sonntag, den 27.11.2016, 22:44 +0000 schrieb ron minnich: > Seems reasonable, but on Harvey recently we went with c11. Any reason not > to do that instead? I am sorry, my statement about Linux was incorrect. Linux is explicitly built with C89 [1][2][3]. ``` HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 ``` So I’d say, coreboot also stays with C89 to be compatible with Linux. Thanks, Paul [1] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTg0MTQ [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=51b97e354ba9fce1890cf38ecc754aa49677fc89 [3] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Makefile#n304
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
