On 02.12.2016 19:53, ron minnich wrote: > yeah I'm similarly confused about the t430 state but nico is giving me hope.
Um, I was just comparing specs, sorry. The T430 seems to be unsupported. Also I guess, it would only be one or two days of work, I wouldn't con- sider to buy it. It's basically just heavier than the T430s (and some come with the shitty NVIDIA Optimus graphics). > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:15 AM Sam Kuper <sam.ku...@uclmail.net> wrote: > >> On 01/12/2016, Nico Huber <nic...@gmx.de> wrote: >>> On 01.12.2016 18:50, Klemens Nanni wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:04:36PM +0000, ron minnich wrote: >>>>> what's the latest best one? >>>>> >>>> X230 if you'd ask me: 16G RAM, 12M ROM. runs fine with reduced >>>> (830K) ME >>>> >>> Everything Klemens said about the X230 should also apply to the >>> T430s. It's just 14" instead of 12". >> >> Has anyone here actually tried running Coreboot with a reduced ME on a >> T430 or T430s? I haven't tried (don't even have the system), but I wouldn't expect any trouble with a reduced ME image. It's more chipset than board specific, FWIW. >> >> The Coreboot wiki does not even have pages for those models... >> >> https://www.coreboot.org/Board:lenovo/t430 >> >> https://www.coreboot.org/Board:lenovo/t430s Perfect, I think you found the first board without outdated information in the wiki :-D Nico -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot