The temperature difference get bigger when the temperature rise.
I recommend the Thermal Grizzly "Kryonaut" over the GC-extreme. The price didnt
matter that much in such cases. I for myself use 5g in about 5 years. "I" think
Thermal Grizzly "Kryonaut" is better.
If i get 5 oder 10g for 15euro - does not really matter.
It would be nice now to see if our information could help drop the temperature
on a quadcore usage inside of the T420.
24. Feb 2017 11:12 by [email protected]:
> Hi, i took my results from this page (could use google translate) - >
> https://www.overclockers.ru/lab/79286_4/testirovanie-termointerfejsov-v-poiskah-idealnoj-termopasty-ili-novinki-protiv-vcherashnih-chempionov.html
> From your 1st test, Grizzly is better by 0.33 C , and from your 2nd test - by
> 0.31 C. Even if your tests are more correct, 10g of GC-Extreme at my local
> market cost the same as 5,55g of Grizzly -- that means, Grizzly is almost
> twice more expensive per 1g ; that is too big price difference for just 0.3 C
> . BTW it took me just 1 year to spend the first 10g, so had to buy another
> 10g....
> 2017-02-24 13:53 GMT+03:00 <> [email protected]> >:
>
>> >> This test here show the opposite:
>> http://extreme.pcgameshardware.de/attachments/831791d1434218266-review-thermal-grizzly-kryonaut-hydronaut-auswertung.jpg
>>
>> The Gelid GC-Extreme is not as good as Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut also listed
>> by this test here:
>> http://overclocking.guide/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Tim_test_update1.png
>>
>> and also some other tests i had read.
>>
>> I dont know where you got this test you paste the results. I have never seen
>> a test result where the GC-extreme was better then the Thermal Grizzly
>> Kryonaut before.
>>
>> 5,55gramm of the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut cost about 15€. I dont think that
>> you should go there for the best price. You apply it once and 5,55g is
>> really much for a normal user. You would probably have enough for years.
>>
>> 23. Feb 2017 16:36 by >> [email protected]>> :
>>
>>
>>> Actually there is an even better non-conductive thermal paste (not liquid
>>> metal) than "Grizzly" --- it is called " Gelid GC-Extreme ". Here is a
>>> comparison from one review website that I screenshotted - >>>
>>> https://s4.postimg.org/qvp326pjx/Thermal_Grease.png>>> . The difference
>>> between them is not big, but I think in your case every degree counts.
>>> Also, there is a packaging of Gelid GC-Extreme that is 10g - >>>
>>> http://gelidsolutions.com/thermal-solutions/thermal-compound-gc-extreme-10g/>>>
>>> , this larger packaging gives a very affordable price per 1g and will
>>> last for a long time ;)
>>>
>>> 2017-02-23 4:49 GMT+03:00 <>>> [email protected]>>> >:
>>>
>>>> >>>> Could you try out "Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut" or even liquid
>>>> metal based products and report about the temperatures? It would be great
>>>> if you could try out first the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and later then for
>>>> example the Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut and report here.
>>>> http://www.overclock.net/t/1588116/thermal-grizzly-conductonaut-73-w-mk
>>>>
>>>> Please clean up the surface before applying when possible with >>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isopropyl_alcohol>>>> (its cheap and easy
>>>> to get).
>>>>
>>>> 23. Feb 2017 01:28 by >>>> [email protected]>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Untested/unknown: If a ivy bridge CPU would work. The OEM bios didn't
>>>>>> had support for those.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ivy Bridge works, have a 3740QM in mine. However, (quoting myself here):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm running one albeit with an i7-3740qm - which is too much thermal
>>>>>> load, runs up to 2.9 GHz for me reaching 93°C (70K to ambient) with fan
>>>>>> set to disengaged, normal auto fan control works and allows up to 2.5
>>>>>> GHz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with that CPU RAPL does not work, thermald does but out-of-the-box
>>>>>> settings gives me less performance than with fix limits, and I'm sure as
>>>>>> hell not going to configure something with an xml config file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> used to have a 2720m which worked without any issues AFAIR, but the
>>>>>> 3740qm effectively gives me double the cores that are a little faster.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Arian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> coreboot mailing list: >>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
