On 17.03.2017 18:17, ron minnich wrote: > This one surprised me: > > "Get Clang going again - what do we need to do to get it going?" > > So, as of a few months ago, after long discussion, the decision as I > understood it was to make us GNU11, not C11. I went back and reviewed the > discussion, and that was how it seemed to come out.
The decision was to make explicit what was already needed for a long time (already last time Clang was working). Don't worry about Clang, it can digest -std=gnu11 as well [1]. Nico [1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#differences-between-various-standard-modes -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
