> I've told my wife that every time she buys a pair of shoes, I get to buy a new computer. > It works out well for both of us, but she's still winning. :)
You should change the rule. You should buy a sport car for each pair of shoes. ;-) Zoran On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Martin Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's the list of boards I've got for coreboot testing. > > https://www.coreboot.org/User:MartinRoth#Platforms_supported_by_coreboot > > My plan is to get as many of these as I can set up for automated testing. > > When new boards are added to the tree, I try to buy them if possible, > but that's a lot of boards. I've told my wife that every time she > buys a pair of shoes, I get to buy a new computer. It works out well > for both of us, but she's still winning. :) > > Martin > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Sam Kuper <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good to hear :) > > > > Does the Coreboot project already have an actual physical board for > > every board listed at https://www.coreboot.org/Supported_Motherboards > > ? If not, is there a list of which physical boards the project has > > (or, conversely, is lacking)? > > > > Thank you for answering all these questions! > > > > P.S. I notice you replied to me individually rather than to the list. > > If that was not intentional, please feel free to CC the list in your > > reply :) > > > > > > On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, ultimately, we'd like to have every board in the coreboot tree > >> tested automatically, if not for every commit, at least daily. So in > >> that respect, It's on the roadmap. It's just slow going. Currently > >> only a single configuration is tested, so that's something that would > >> need to be updated as well. Once that happens, I don't have any > >> problem with testing a cut-down ME. > >> > >> Martin > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Sam Kuper <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Most of our current automated testing is just build testing, although > >>>> we're working to expand that. The boot testing we DO have doesn't > >>>> currently include any boards with an ME - they're currently all boards > >>>> that don't require any blobs. > >>> > >>> Thanks for the info :) > >>> > >>> Is it on Coreboot's roadmap to do automated boot testing of boards > >>> that have a Management Engine? If so, is my suggestion to also test > >>> for incompatibilities with me_cleaner a feasible one? > >>> > >>> Thanks again :) > >> > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
