On 31/03/2017, Nico Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31.03.2017 23:38, Sam Kuper wrote: >> On 31/03/2017, David Hendricks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Sam Kuper <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Also, to further address Patrick's point above about marketing >>>> material: it is important that the provenance of information about >>>> Coreboot can be established. This is a reputational matter. That means >>>> it is important that people should not legally be able to misrepresent >>>> Coreboot contributors' views, etc, >>> >>> Both CC-BY and CC-BY-SA have "no endorsement" clauses >> >> Yes, but because CC BY imposes no restrictions on *second*-derivative >> works, > > [...] > I'm not convinced. Relicensing adapted > work under different conditions would require the explicit permission > by the copyright holder.
No, it wouldn't. That's what makes CC BY different from CC BY-SA. (And I think you mean "licensing" rather than "relicensing", assuming we are both talking about the first time that the *adapted work* is licensed to the public.) > And I can't find that permission in CC BY. See, especially, §1(a), §1(c), §1(h), §3(b), §3(d), and §4(b): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode Regards. -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
