On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:20 PM Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > > I wonder if we should just import libfdt when we need to parse or > > modify devicetree blobs. A quick check on the libfdt.a on my > > system (x86_64) shows that the set of .o files takes about 15kB, so > > it's not huge. > > If the license is compatible I think that's a good idea. >
yeah, I agree with you both. > > > > I think we should consider splitting the memory-resident part of > > coreboot on RISC-V into its own stage, similar to the SMM code on x86. > > Is there any way a system can work completely without it? > > one way, which I've done, is for a kernel to supply its own code, i.e. move the responsibility for supplying M-mode code to the kernel and away from firmware.f This would remove some concerns people have about run-time firmware, since there would not be any :-) ron
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
