According to this picture: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/Unix_history-simple.svg
Seems that FreeBSD takes much slower development than Linux. Thus it is much more stable, it seems. Since my best take on it is that there are 10x or maybe even 100x developers on Linux. I see that it has 3.3-11.x mark from 1999. Since then, Linux went from 2.2 kernels to currently 4.14. It is an interesting decision... I should think about FreeBSD as well. Zoran On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Ivan Ivanov <qmaster...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, FreeBSD is my primary OS at my coreboot'ed machine at the moment. > I got a bit disappointed at Linux recent developments and decided to switch > > Best regards, > Ivan Ivanov > > 2017-12-03 14:35 GMT+03:00 ingegneriafore...@alice.it > <ingegneriafore...@alice.it>: > > Hello guys, > > > > I apologize with you for the strange question. > > > > Can you tell me if some of you uses coreboot with the Freebsd Operating > > system on its machine ? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Vincenzo. > > > > > > Forensic Consultant > > Tribunale di Lecce > > > > Studio: Strada di Garibaldi - Contrada Paradisi > > 73010 Lequile (LE) > > > > cell: 339.7968555 > > skype: vincenzo.di_salvo > > > > -- > > coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org > > https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot > > -- > coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org > https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
