FYI https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/29820/3/MAINTAINERS#219
We will take care of the SoC support. I think Werner will jump in as well. On 28.11.18 22:04, Nico Huber wrote: > On 28.11.18 02:59, Jay Talbott wrote: >> Although I have participated in a number of reviews of coreboot patches, >> I/we have not directly upstreamed any patches to coreboot.org. As a pure >> consulting service, the ports and customizations that we have made to >> coreboot to support our clients' hardware (including the work done for >> Intel) is turned over to the client at the end of each project to do >> with as they please. If they choose to upstream it or not to >> coreboot.org is really up to them, and if they do, it would get >> upstreamed by them, not by us, since they then own the code. > You could change the terms, I guess. Many people don't care that much. > So you could ask your clients ahead if they'd agree to license the code > under the GPL (or maybe only the parts that are not in their mainboard/ > dir). If somebody agrees and it turns out later that there is a commit > that could benefit upstream, you can push it. > > Nico > -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
