Dear Nico, Thank you for your explanation.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:09 PM Nico Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, coreboot's microcode should be up to date. However, in your log, > it never tries to apply the update, it seems (it should tell something > about the `cpu_microcode_blob.bin`). I also can't find any call in the > current source that would try to update microcode, so this might be a > recent regression. Ah, yes, the regression seems to be introduced when parallel MP initialization had been enabled for Intel Core 2 family according to the commit log of related directories. I will check out and test a revision just before the change. > If anybody wants to look into this, one clue so far: in `src/cpu/ > intel/model_1067x/mp_init.c` a `.get_microcode_info` pointer seems to be > missing in the `struct mp_ops`. Also, the microcode should be updated > once in advance for the BSP. This could be done early in the bootblock > (as it is for `cpu/intel/model_206ax/`) or later, e.g. right before > running mp_init_with_smm(). Best regards, Masanori _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
