If you have the source code to build a binaryPI, I think you can `cd
binarypi/stoney-pi/AmdAgesaPkg && make Agesa_B2_Target`. I've never
tried it though.


On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:58 AM Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo
<jorg...@cirsa.com> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> A clarification. From the StoneyPI_1_3_0_A.ZIP file I've got under NDA is it 
> possible to compile it and get the AGESA.bin file?
> For instance, for the fam15tn family the coreboot build process generates a 
> libagesa.fam15tn.a file which is integrated in the
> final coreboot.rom file. Could it be possible to do the same from a PI 
> family? The build process in coreboot is only prepared to
> use a wrapper and the AGESA.bin file, but maybe is it possible to generate 
> the AGESA.bin from the zip file...
>
> Thanks!
>
> ________________________________
> De: Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo <jorg...@cirsa.com>
> Enviado: martes, 2 de julio de 2019 14:25
> Para: Kyösti Mälkki
> Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org
> Asunto: [coreboot] Re: Question about blobs
>
> Hi Kyösti! Thanks for the info!
>
> >AMD contracted SilverBack for the tasks on StoneyRidge (and
> >MerlinFalcon apparently). The source is a heavily modified StoneyPI
> >package. You may get the unmodified one from AMD reps under NDA. Or
> >pay SilverBack for the development you would be more capable of doing
> >yourself, and you still might not get a license that allows
> >distributing the work. There was a promise of scrubbing and
> >relicensing StoneyPI source but... Let's just say legalities messed it
> >up, I don't have the details.
>
> Yes, the AMD reps we're in touch answer me to get in touch with SilverBack to 
> get support :(
> We've been able to get a more recent StoneyPI_1_3_0_A.ZIP under NDA because 
> I've seen
> this version fixed the issue:
>
> EMBSWDEV-4487: System is not booting when memory is connected only to DIMM 1 
> slot
>
> maybe related with our problem, but I don't know how to integrate this code 
> into coreboot...
> And if you say that the current work in coreboot is from a heavily modified 
> base from SilverBack
> I don't have any chance to make it work...
>
> >As for the the other blobs (MullinsPI, CarrizoPI, KaveriPI), those
> >were either built at SAGE (R.I.P.) or AMD AES (R.I.P.) and I have been
> >told the repositories and toolchains were never officially transferred
> >to SilverBack's possession. In other words, even if you paid,
> >SilverBack is not likely to work on those.
>
> Then, no more options to get a working BIOS than SilverBack?
>
> >I believe we have talked before. Maybe it was about CarrizoPI? I was
> >asking for commercial adopters around coreboot and binaryPI, in
> >attempts to get to the same negotiation table with AMD management. Did
> >You or Your manager ever respond?
>
> Yes. I began asking in the coreboot mailing list about the Bettong mainboard. 
> I added TPM support
> and tianocore to that demoboard. I remember the email and I answered it 
> giving my support because
> we thought coreboot is the way to go to support our custom board.
>
> Regards,
> Jorge
>
> _______________________________________________
> coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org

Reply via email to