On 20.11.2019 16:38, awokd via coreboot wrote: > Michal Zygowski: > >> I will soon update my patches with C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK for binaryPI >> which will be rebased on top of postcar patches (easier for CAR teardown). > Does https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36914 also address > C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK for classic AGESA? Besides Coverity issues, is > that the only objection to keeping them in the tree? Thanks for your > work on this; I can test on a Fam15h if it helps. > Got C bootblock working on apu2 (fam16h) just few moments ago. Aiming to cover all possible families (fam14h-fam16h) both AGESA and binaryPI. Will need testing for mainboards. have binaryPI fam16h (apu2) and AGESA fam14h (apu1) at hand, so these will be tested and robust. However I will need some testing for other families. Your help will be appreciated. I will also announce the ready patches on mailing list when I finish the work and call for testing the mainboards.
-- Michał Żygowski Firmware Engineer http://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
