Although I found this article https://www.coreboot.org/Creating_Valid_IRQ_Tables , I'm not sure if it applies to mainboard_picr_data/_intr_data : considering a problem from my previous msg - where a copy-paste of old picr/intr data structures gave the bad results. Could you please clarify if this article is still valid for these new data structures? If not, how to get the correct values for mainboard_picr_data/_intr_data using Linux?
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:23 PM Mike Banon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear friends, I'm trying to properly program the IRQ tables for Lenovo > G505S, because the old IRQ routing is bad and doesn't work for a > simple OS like Kolibri. Full details are in the comments under this > change: > > https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46587/ > > When I used the old picr_data/intr_data values of G505S for the new > structures, I got only 1 IRQ working. However, with a copy-paste of > AM1I-A - surprisingly 12 IRQs and a laptop boots, but still some > problems. Please advise how to compose mainboard_picr_data/_intr_data > and also a intel_irq_routing_table, your help will be very much > appreciated. > > Best regards, > Mike Banon _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
