Hello,

Thanks for the answer. 

Br, Dani

2018. november 13., kedd 20:02:06 UTC+1 időpontban David Michael a 
következőt írta:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:16 AM Daniel McAllister <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > 
> > Hello All, 
> > 
> > I am developing on something that I call "An encrypted overlay file 
> system with tpm2.0" for coreos. The feature is basically a new dracut 
> module which will mount a new file system on top of the normal file system 
> as an overlay. This new file system is luks encrypted and the disk 
> encryption key can be stored in the tpm2.0 chipset. 
> > I have added a new cmdline argument which represents the following: 
> > -What is the device name for the encrypted data (the 'writes' will go on 
> this partitions). 
> > -The disk encryption key is sealed to what PCRs 
> > -The nvram index where the disk encryption key is 
> > 
> > Missing features that is maybe helpful: 
> > -Master recovery passphrase if the tpm2.0 fails to give the disk 
> encryption key 
> > 
> > I would like to ask some input and also on what you think on this 
> feature. Is it needed, you see reasonable chance that this merge request 
> will be accepted. 
> > The code is not fully polished, but here are the two repositories: 
> > https://github.com/rasztasd/coreos-overlay 
> > https://github.com/rasztasd/bootengine 
> > 
> > I would like to merge it as soon as possible (if possible), so any input 
> will be appreciated. 
>
> Thanks for sharing this, but we are unlikely to merge new features at 
> this time.  Container Linux is in maintenance mode through at least 
> 2019, when Fedora CoreOS ( https://coreos.fedoraproject.org/ ) will be 
> the actively developed community distro. 
>
> Since your work is a general dracut module, you could try to have it 
> packaged in Fedora through their normal process and start the 
> discussion of having it installed in Fedora CoreOS.  You can join 
> #fedora-coreos on freenode or subscribe to 
> [email protected] <javascript:> if you'd like to get 
> involved with 
> development. 
>
> Thanks. 
>
> David 
>

Reply via email to