On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:29:25PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/10/2010 04:26 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:15:34PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > > [...] > >> Should patches go to bug-coreutils@, or is coreutils@ the preferred > >> place now-a-days? Or does it depend on contents - bug fix patches > >> to the former, and maint stuff like this to the latter? > > > > Patch submissions should probably go to coreutils-patches@ ;) > > Which does not (yet?) exist. Do we want one?
Well, I'm just joking, here is more serious answer: On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:12:07AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > Chen Guo wrote: > > I'm assuming non-bug-fix patch submissions (i.e. adding features) should go > > to bug-coreutils still? > > Yes. > I've made [email protected] an alias for bug-coreutils. -- ldv
pgp6RQ5NFYO2s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
