On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:32 AM, marcel partap <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear coreutil hackers,
> as anyone doing *n*x housework regularly, i also am using these tools on a
> regular basis, in scripts and manually. What i often miss (especially when
> invoking actions recursively with -Rc, and regretting part of the
> modifications shortly after) is the output of the original state the file
> was in. Example:
>
>> changed ownership of `robots.txt' to www-data:www-data
>>
> Well i am glad about that, but who was it owned by before? It would be nice
> to have this shown as one of
>
>> changed ownership of `robots.txt' to www-data:www-data (from root:root)
>> changed ownership of `robots.txt' from root:root to www-data:www-data
>> changed ownership of `robots.txt' root:root > www-data:www-data
>>
> While this example is not of much importance.. well consider this (made
> up):
>
>> mode of `/var/www/drupal-hfopi/files/temp/._/._/._/._/._/.shell.pl'
>> changed to 0666 (rw-rw-rw-)
>>
> Mmmkay, ack that file shouldn't be +x... but what would be of real
> interest: WAS it executable before? Same proposal mockup:
>
>> mode of `/var/www/drupal-hfopi/files/temp/._/._/._/._/._/.shell.pl'
>> changed to 0666 (rw-rw-rw-)  (from 0777 (rwxrwxrwx))
>> mode of `/var/www/drupal-hfopi/files/temp/._/._/._/._/._/.shell.pl'
>> changed from 0777 (rwxrwxrwx) to 0666 (rw-rw-rw-)
>> mode of `/var/www/drupal-hfopi/files/temp/._/._/._/._/._/.shell.pl'
>> changed: 0777 (rwxrwxrwx) > 0666 (rw-rw-rw-)
>>
> To not break any scripts, this could be implemented as
> --print-original-state additional option to -v/-c. And please forgive for
> not attaching a finished patch ;)
> best regards,
> marcel.
>
>
I know this is an old post, but is there any objections to this feature? If
not, what exact mechanics do you think it should take? Assuming there are no
objections, I would like to take this on.

Thank you,
William


-- 
"Once GNU is written, everyone will be able to obtain good system software
free, just like air."-- RMS in the GNU Manifesto

Reply via email to