FYI, I considered skipping this as a known bug, but hear that it should be fixed "soon", so prefer to continue to see the failure until it's resolved.
>From 0960e0c83d2a79d260f2b83bb273ed13ef5bbea1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:34:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tests: mention that btrfs also causes failure of misc/ls-time * tests/misc/ls-time: Mention that this test also fails on btrfs, at least until http://bugzilla.redhat.com/591068 is addressed. --- tests/misc/ls-time | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/misc/ls-time b/tests/misc/ls-time index beea159..60d43ac 100755 --- a/tests/misc/ls-time +++ b/tests/misc/ls-time @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ else cat >&2 << \EOF failed ls ctime test -- this failure is expected at least for SunOS4.1.4 and for tmpfs file systems on Solaris 5.5.1. +It is also expected to fail on a btrfs file systems until +http://bugzilla.redhat.com/591068 is fixed. In the output below, `c' should have had a ctime more recent than that of `a', but does not. -- 1.7.3.1.216.g329be