Karl Heuer wrote: >>I think we're ok on the copyright front, since split >>used to be part of the textutils and you have an assignment >>on file for that project. > > Great. I am, of course, OK with assigning copyright in any case. > >>Do you feel like updating NEWS and doc/coreutils.texi and/or >>writing a test or two? > > Sure. I haven't looked at the format for new tests; it might save > some time if I just say that input FOO should produce output BAR, > and let someone else translate that into what's needed. Meanwhile, > if someone else thinks of tests that should be included (or finds > a problem with my code as written), keep me in the loop to avoid > duplication of effort.
You may want to use tests/sample-test as a starting point and to take inspiration from the others in tests/misc/split-*.
