On 06/03/2011 09:06 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 03/06/11 15:52, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Nice. Thanks! >> I haven't tried it yet. How long does it take to run? >> Sounds like a good candidate to be run as a syntax-check rule. > > It's awkward (relies on a llvm/clang source tree for example) > and currently requires human interpretation. > It basically takes as long as clang-analyzer does. > Not a candidate for automation at present.
In other words, our existing sc_prohibit_XXX_without_use rules are faster at doing the job, once we take the time to write the rules for each header. Are any of the headers you cleaned up in your pass worth porting into gnulib's maint.mk as new sc_prohibit_XXX_without_use rules? -- Eric Blake [email protected] +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
