[re-adding coreutils list] On Saturday 18 June 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: > Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > [off-list] > > > > On Saturday 18 June 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> > A tiny silly cosmetic patch. > >> > > >> > I post it here because I couldn't find a "coreutils-patches" list; I > >> > hope it's ok, and if not, sorry in advance. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> coreutils@ is better for something trivial like this. > >> Then we don't get an "issue" number in debbugs and > >> we don't have to bother marking it as "done". > >> > > OK, I'll bear that in mind, thank you. > > > > BTW, is there any plan about introducing a 'coreutils-patches' list? > > No. > You're also welcome to send patches to the bug-coreutils list, > as documented in README-hacking: > > * Submitting patches > > If you develop a fix or a new feature, please send it to the > appropriate bug-reporting address as reported by the --help option of > each program. > > Questions like this are better posted to the mailing list. > OK, let's then make the answer public, at least :-)
> If you're asking it, odds are that you're not the only person > who would benefit from a response. > > Keeping as much as possible in the open (i.e., on public mailing lists) > is better for "community spirit", too: > > http://producingoss.com/en/setting-tone.html#avoid-private-discussions > Thanks, and sorry for the confusion. Stefano
