Jim Meyering wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Jim Meyering wrote: > >> For minimal overhead ls, use only the -1U options. > >> I.e., type exactly this: > >> > >> env ls -1U > > > > What benefit is provided by invoking through 'env' in that example > > without any environment modifications specified? I am sure I am > > missing something and would enjoy the education. > > Using "env" like that is the portable and shell-agnostic way to ensure > you run the program rather than an alias or shell function named "ls".
Ah... Yes. Good call. Thanks! Bob
