Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 13/07/11 12:57, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > * src/mktemp.c (usage): As above, for --help. > > Reported by Jordi Pujol in http://bugs.debian.org/551093. > > --- > > THANKS.in | 1 + > > src/mktemp.c | 5 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/THANKS.in b/THANKS.in > > index 05d5922..8d61a05 100644 > > --- a/THANKS.in > > +++ b/THANKS.in > > @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ John Stanley > > [email protected] > > John Summerfield [email protected] > > Jon Peatfield [email protected] > > Joost van Baal [email protected] > > +Jordi Pujol [email protected] > > Jorge Stolfi [email protected] > > Joseph S. Myers [email protected] > > Josh Triplett [email protected] > > diff --git a/src/mktemp.c b/src/mktemp.c > > index c6d0e58..0017cbd 100644 > > --- a/src/mktemp.c > > +++ b/src/mktemp.c > > @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ Create a temporary file or directory, safely, and print > > its name.\n\ > > TEMPLATE must contain at least 3 consecutive `X's in last component.\n\ > > If TEMPLATE is not specified, use tmp.XXXXXXXXXX, and --tmpdir is > > implied.\n\ > > "), stdout); > > + fputs (_("\ > > +The group and others get no permission, while the user gets read and > > write\n\ > > +permissions (as well as search, for directories), possibly reduced by > > the\n\ > > +umask.\n\ > > +"), stdout); > > fputs ("\n", stdout); > > fputs (_("\ > > -d, --directory create a directory, not a file\n\ > > It's unfortunate that this runs onto 3 lines
I completely agree. I tried to make it shorter, but couldn't come up with a good formulation. > and also I don't like the use of "possibly". How about: > > s/possibly reduced by the umask/umask permitting/ I see your point, but "umask permitting" may be a bit more difficult to grasp depending on the reader's level of English. How about just dropping the "possibly"? I was only using it to express the fact that sometimes the permissions are left unchanged by the umask, but that's usually implied. And now that I think of it, "restricted" might be a better word than "reduced". I have no strong objections to your suggestion though, so feel free to commit it that way if you feel it's the best alternative. Cheers, -- Benoît Knecht
