Pádraig Brady wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > Thanks again for all this testing. > I'm travelling at the moment so will > only be fleetingly responsive. > > On 10/08/2011 02:23 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: >> On Linux/HPPA (32-bit kernel) 2 tests fail: >> >> FAIL: misc/timeout-parameters > >>From your analysis, this seems like an overflow within the kernel, > as we check all overflows as far as I can see. > >> FAIL: tail-2/follow-name > > This should work around the issue. > > commit 2b82ee76df6c4c36d854218d3407d9fa9170ef0a > Author: Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> > Date: Sun Oct 9 11:25:34 2011 +0100 > > tests: avoid a false failure on systems without inotify > > * tests/tail-2/follow-name: Exclude the inotify warning > from the comparison. > Reported by Bruno Haible. > > diff --git a/tests/tail-2/follow-name b/tests/tail-2/follow-name > index ef9434a..e34b779 100755 > --- a/tests/tail-2/follow-name > +++ b/tests/tail-2/follow-name > @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ EOF > timeout 10 tail --follow=name no-such > out 2> err > test $? = 1 || fail=1 > > +# Remove an inconsequential inotify warning so > +# we can compare against the above error > +sed '/inotify cannot be used/d' err > k && mv k err
Looks reasonable. Thanks!
