On Tuesday 15 November 2011 16:48:38 Jim Meyering wrote: > I've noticed a few references in recent commit logs like this: > > See additional discussion in Bug#9939. > > My preference has been to use the slightly more verbose > http://bugs.gnu.org/DDDDD, on the principle that that will > be more accessible to most people. I.e., you can probably > just click on it, or mouse-then-click. While for the "Bug#...." > form, one would have to know the URL prefix. > > Preferences to the contrary?
i think the trade off is to use a git tag like:
URL: http://bugs.gnu.org/DDDDD
or:
X-URL: http://bugs.gnu.org/DDDDD
or:
X-Coreutils-Bug: DDDDD
X-Coreutils-Bug-URL: http://bugs.gnu.org/DDDDD
in my own projects, i tend to use "#DDDDD" in the logs and then supplement
with URL: tags.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
