On 08/31/2012 08:12 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> 
> From ea8043e5b08956b804c1cc3cb79ee54f2d969b36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:05:29 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] maint: check-programs-vs-x: avoid a new syntax-check
>  failure
> 
> * cfg.mk (check-programs-vs-x): The new variable,
> $(all-progs-but-lbracket) contains libstdbuf.so, and it does
> not have a corresponding .x file, so exempt it.
> ---
>  cfg.mk | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/cfg.mk b/cfg.mk
> index 87f54c0..e1bcf27 100644
> --- a/cfg.mk
> +++ b/cfg.mk
> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ all-progs-but-lbracket = $(filter-out [,$(patsubst 
> src/%,%,$(all_programs)))
>  check-programs-vs-x:
>       @status=0;                                      \
>       for p in dummy $(all-progs-but-lbracket); do    \
> +       case $$p in *.so) continue;; esac;            \
>         test $$p = dummy && continue;                 \
>         test $$p = ginstall && p=install || : ;       \
>         test -f $(srcdir)/man/$$p.x                   \
>
Oh.  I hadn't noticed any failure here.  Weird.  Oh well, probably I
missed in in the fully of fix/amend/rebase/....

Thanks for taking care of those issues.

Regards,
  Stefano


Reply via email to