On 11/22/2012 02:27 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On 11/22/2012 03:02 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
No backwards compat issues to worry about yet.
yes. ;-)
Patch looks good.
Thanks for the review.
BTW: Although I also reordered the fields in the description
in usage() and in the description of each field in coreutils.texi,
there's no explicit documentation about the default order yet.
Should I squash in something like this?
I'd say yes.
It doesn't tie us any tighter to a particular order,
since we'll be bound after a while by backwards compat anyway.
So it's best to be explicit so that people who bother
to check these things have the info at hand.
thanks,
Pádraig.
